Compare NomOS
Existing assistants, business applications and custom solutions may already cover much of your work. Identify what remains difficult: maintaining current policies, managing approvals or reusing earlier decisions. An additional platform needs to justify itself against those requirements.
Five comparisons
Compare capabilities along with setup, maintenance and operating effort. The impact graph is relevant when your workflows need a shared, maintained basis for knowledge and decisions. Your existing solution may already be sufficient.
A governed AI workspace with approved agents, persistent context collections, runtime controls, model switching and a security-led data architecture.
Read the comparisonFine-grained control inside the agent loop, with routing, budgets, quality scoring and policy enforcement for each step.
Read the comparisonDeep integration into Microsoft 365 and access to personal work context through Microsoft Graph, within existing permissions.
Read the comparisonA mature AI assistant with a managed workspace, capable models, connected apps and Company Knowledge with citations.
Read the comparisonHigh technical flexibility, direct architectural control and a precise solution for a clearly bounded search or assistant use case.
Read the comparisonThe category
NomOS connects sources and their validity with approvals, decisions and corrections. Use a second comparable case to test what can be reused. Another platform is worthwhile when that benefit justifies integration and maintenance effort.
We test this in the 30-day pilot.
Put the decision into the workflow
We test two real workflows for 30 days using your assumptions and your company foundation.
Use NomOS web chat and current MCP capabilities for the comparison: retrieve knowledge, submit proposals, assess planned actions and reuse results. NomGate and NomApp are planned extensions, not evidence of control available today.
Explore MCP capabilities ↗