Value and effort
When teams search the same sources and clarify the same policies for similar tasks, preparation is repeated. NomOS makes approved knowledge and reviewed decisions reusable. Whether that is worthwhile for your workflows also depends on setup and ongoing maintenance.
This fictional quote example contrasts a general answer with a proposal based on an internal policy and approval path. The answers and blocked action are simulated. Technical controls depend on the integration; the example does not run a model.
Fictional example What discount may I give this customer on the annual package?
Without an applicable basis
Discounts between 10 and 20 per cent are common, and often more on annual contracts. For a strategically important customer you can aim at the upper end and justify it over the contract term.
The answer sounds plausible but does not account for your internal rule.
With NomOS
Up to 15 per cent you can approve yourself. Above that the division lead has to approve, and the basis is the current price list, not last year’s prices.
Send the quote with a 22 per cent discount
Blocked in this example
Reason: The discount is above the limit you may approve yourself, and no approval from the division lead is on file.
Exception path: Request a time-limited exception from the division lead, with a reason and an expiry date.
The impact graph connects the source used with the proposal, approval and decision. A reviewed basis can be reused as long as it still applies. Changes, exceptions and corrections still require subject-matter review.
How long do comparable cases take today and in the pilot, including search and follow-up questions?
Which proposals need correcting? Can the sources and approvals used be traced?
How much work do IT and process owners spend on integration, source review and policy changes?
How do platform, model and operating costs compare with usable time savings? Do not count increased throughput again as a full time saving.
In the 30-day pilot, we compare two real workflows with your current way of working. We agree on evaluation criteria, scope and a fixed price before starting. The joint evaluation shows whether adoption makes sense.
Agents submit findings through MCP for review in NomOS. Once adopted, they are available for further tasks. What gets reused is the knowledge and its rationale. We measure how much repeated research and model work this avoids, including retrieval, updates and review.
How agents contribute knowledge ↗The calculator estimates working time and model context from your inputs. Example values are not customer results. The reusable share describes your assumption, not measured savings.